21 Comments

Feeding your body, feeding your mind. Information and food. The same rules apply. Consume a healthy, balanced diet. Go for a walk. Avoid the junk, the processed. Facts as whole ingredients. The endless barrage of opinions, spin, persuasive tactics, the sugar-salt-fat drive-thru fast-food colorful packaging of information. They know how to feed the addiction so we consume more and more. Filling our ears and eyes and shopping carts beyond satiety. And those at the top of the pyramid grow richer, and feed us more.

Perhaps an occasional fast is in order. An elimination diet. Mind your gut biome. Mind your brain biome. And go for a walk.

Expand full comment

Such a good point! I think it's a great metaphor. And I am much more concerned about my info diet now than I used to be.

Expand full comment

Another heuristic: have an articulate friend you can argue with. When I had such a friend we would go to dinner and hammer each other for hours, even about things we agreed on. (One night the guy cooking across from us said he'd had the best seat in the house.) There's no better way to surface your assumptions and stress-test your reasoning. And it's fun! (But mutual respect and good humor are hard prerequisites)

Expand full comment

To a first approximation, I offer for consideration the following adjusted candidates for suggmmandmentsTM 2 and it's complement:

#2: Thou shalt, to a first approximation, count and express thine enumerated approximations.

Secondly approximated, yet ne'er afore, quoth an percentage of approximation pursuant unto contextual attendance.

Thirdly approximated, presume unsighted presumption, inquire forthwith, cite necessity of form and enticements, demark incented permissions, reduce to reveal presumption.

Fourthly approximated, construct an scaffold dialectical of distances betwixt fruitfulness and failure, satisfact and resentment, due weights and induced certitudes. Endure the edifice to collapse as it may, and beware that which, for all the chaos about it, obdures the imbalance of tidal diminution.

#3 Speak plainly and trust what is supported plainly.

Expand full comment

Great commandments! Of course the ultimate test comes when we apply these to beliefs we really want to hold onto, like... "animal agriculture is humane and sustainable". All too often, when we hit those sorts of beliefs, the brains of even the most dedicated rationalists turn to mush :)

Expand full comment

Agree, my fellow sent!

Expand full comment

You were fabulous on the Daily Show!!!

Expand full comment

Thank you Linda!

Expand full comment

Life is ever changing and the need to question our own beliefs should be a part of it. Keeping ourselves honest. Great piece and looking forward to the next 5 suggestions.

Expand full comment

I love the one on assigning percentages.

I can't remember where I watched this, maybe it was Destiny on YouTube. But I'd go even further on it.

I'd convert the belief into betting odds and see if I'd be willing to put money on it at those odds.

Imagining putting money on the line seems to be a really good way at keeping those percentages honest.

Expand full comment

First time reader of your Substack! Thanks so much for your common sense, Pitch Perfect observations, & starting my morning with laughing out loud. Plan to share this widely!

Expand full comment

You lost me at “The Atlantic Monthly is more reliable than Newsmax.”

Expand full comment

I enjoyed your appearance with Jon Stewart. It was shortly after I subscribed and erased any buyer’s remorse 👍🏻😁

Expand full comment

I can only imagine how streesfull the Factcheking My Life project was but I hope that some day no that far into the future we'll get to read it.

Expand full comment

Thank you Al!

Expand full comment

I love to read your posts. I'm interested to hear what you have been thinking and where it leads you. But I really read them because of sentences like this one:

"So I don’t want to fetishize this heuristic." Thanks for writing! Ann

Expand full comment

Ha! Thanks so much for that Ann!

Expand full comment

I'll try to be nice in mentioning this: "Superforecasting" was co-written by Tetlock and Dan Gardner, whom I hope you did not intend to slight. In fact, insofar as attraction to certitude goes, I recommend the latter's "Future Babble: Why Expert Predictions Fail - and Why We Believe Them Anyway"

Expand full comment

Aha! Excellent point, thanks Mark. I will change it now. This is why I have epistemic humility, and I hope you have epistemic forgiveness.

Expand full comment

I’m wondering if the “ten” vs “five” is deliberate (i think it is). To make sure we are paying attention and/or that there are five more strong suggestions coming. I hope there are more coming as these five are fantastic! Thank you ❤️

Expand full comment

Thank you Deborah! Love to hear it. And YES! This is Part one of two. The second five commandments are coming in the next couple of weeks!

Expand full comment